The FBI is reportedly investigating an Israeli spyware vendor to see if it had any involvement in possible personal and governmental hacks.
Reuters reported Thursday, citing four people familiar with the inquiry, that the FBI is looking into NSO Group Technologies.
One person interviewed by the FBI told Reuters that the bureau has been looking at the company since 2017, when it was attempting to determine whether the company had received code from American hackers that can be used to infect smartphones.
NSO’s software Pegasus has the ability to collect everything on a phone. The company told Reuters it sells spy software and technical support only to governments, and those tools are used to go after terrorists and other criminals. It also has maintained that its products cannot be used against U.S. phone numbers, but some experts have dismissed that claim.
The FBI had more interviews with technology experts after Facebook filed a lawsuit in October alleging NSO took advantage of its WhatsApp messaging service to hack 1,400 people, Reuters reported, citing two people who had spoken with Justice Department officials.
The bureau is also trying to figure out if any U.S. or allied government officials have been hacked with NSO products and which nations were responsible for the hacks, a Western official briefed on the investigation told the news wire.
The Israeli spyware vendor told Reuters it is not aware of the probe.
“We have not been contacted by any U.S. law enforcement at all about any such matters,” NSO said in a statement provided to Reuters by a public affairs firm.
The FBI told the news wire that it “adheres to DOJ’s policy of neither confirming nor denying the existence of any investigation, so we wouldn’t be able to provide any further comment.”
The business strategy firm FTI Consulting, which was hired after Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos‘s phone was hacked following a message from the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, said NSO could have provided the technology to Saudi Arabia. NSO denied this, and Saudi Arabia called the idea “absurd.” Other experts have said evidence showing this is inconclusive, Reuters noted.